Non-Halal Meat is Unhealthy and Indisposed
A Scientific Explanation

An Extract from http://www.islamtheabsolutetruth.com/non.html

 

We live in a world inhabited not only by humans but also by countless other creatures that share the world with us. Animals provide resources and services that we use. They form part of the life-support system of the earth on which all life depends. Every kind of thing is produced on the earth in due balance and measure. The Qur'an amply describes this ecological and organic vision of the world:

The earth We have spread out (like a carpet), set thereon mountains firm and immovable, and produced therein all kinds of things in due balance. (al-Qur'an - Chapter 15, Verse 19)

We see that each animal has been created with a specific purpose, either to benefit human beings directly, or as symbols for people to ponder over God's greatness (al-Qur'an - Chapter 16, Verse 5, 8; Chapter 24, Verse 45).

And, you will see many of them striving with one another to hasten in sin and exceeding the limits, and their eating of what is unlawfully required. Certainly evil is that which they do.

Why do not the learned men and doctors of law prohibit them from speaking of what is sinful and their eating of what is unlawfully acquired? Certainly evil is that which they work. (al-Qur'an- Chapter 5, Verses 62-63)

Say, Did you note how Allah (SWT) sends down to you all kinds of provisions, then you render some of them unlawful, and some lawful? Say, Did Allah (SWT) give you permission to do this? Alternatively, do you fabricate lies and attribute them to Allah? (al-Qur'an- Chapter 10, Verse 59)

Meat of that Animal Slaughtered by Non-Muslims is Forbidden in Islam al-Qur'an has clearly stated that consuming that animal's meat, which non-Muslims have slaughtered, and in an un-Islamic manner, is forbidden and prohibited.

Allah (SWT) has forbidden you what dies of itself, and blood, and the flesh of the swine, and that over which any other name than that of Allah (SWT) has been invoked . (al-Qur'an- Chapter 2, Verse 173)

Qur'an, Chapter 5, Verse 3, and in Chapter 6, verse 146 calls for a similar behavior in Muslims. For the meat to be halal and consumed by Muslims, the following must take place and this is agreed in general by ALL Muslims around the world.

  • The person who slaughters the animal must be a Muslim.

  • The name of Allah must be pronounced before incision is made, facing the animal in the direction of the sacred Ka'bah in Makkah al-Mukarramah.

  • The instrument being used for slaughtering should be extremely sharp.

  • The incision should be made in the neck just below the glottis, cutting the throat and esophagus, the jugular vein and the carotid artery without cutting the spinal cord.

  • Kamoonpuri (1998) makes a further statement and says that the person slaughtering the animal must not interfere with the carcass before convulsions have completely ceased and the animal is pronounced dead. Skinning or dismembering the animal just after the slaughter is also not recommended in Islam.

    Youth and Muslims of today question as to why the Book of Allah has such strict commands when people in modern societies live together and work together as friends and brothers, and strongly believe in sharing. There are two reasons for this ruling, and we shall explain both, and in the light of conscious and intelligent info-energy that we have already introduced.

    Animals Slaughtered the Muslim Way does NOT Cause Harm to the Animal

    The Prophet (S) has said:

    Allah (SWT) calls for mercy in everything. So be merciful when you slaughter; sharpen your blade to relieve its pain.

    According to Kamoonpuri (1998), the prescribed method of slaughtering an animal in Islam saves the animal from any kind of pain. When the animals major blood vessel in the neck is cut-off that produces an immediate stunning effect. The advantage of not cutting the spinal cord is that the brain continues to send it electrical impulses to the heart demanding blood. As all the blood is drained, the pipeline, which takes blood to the brain, has already been cut off. The violent reactions in the animal are from the natural muscular contraction and no pain is experienced. Kamoonpuri (1998) mentions two researchers, Gucel and Erbil who subscribe to the fact that blood can cause toxicity in the animal's meat, all has to be drained, and the Islamic way of slaughtering takes care of that.

    Schultz and Hazim surgically implanted several electrodes at various points on the skull of animal subjects; then making a deep incision with a sharp knife on the neck of the jugular veins and carotid arteries of both sides. Some animals were then slaughtered by making a swift, deep incision with a sharp knife on the neck cutting the jugular veins and the carotid arteries of sides as well as the trachea and esophagus (Islamic Method). Other animals were stunned using a Captive Bolt Pistol (CBP). During the experiment, electroencephalograph (EEG) and electrocardiograms (EKG) recorded the condition of the brain and the heart of all animals. The results were as follows:

    Islamic Method

    1. During the first three seconds after slaughtering, the EEG did not record any change, thus indicating that the animal did not feel any pain during or immediately after the incision.

    2. For the following three seconds, the EEG recorded a condition of deep sleep unconsciousness. This is due to the large quantity of blood gushing out of the body.

    3. After this total of six seconds, the EEG recorded zero level, showing no feeling of pain at all.

    4. As the brain message (EEG) dropped to zero level, the heart was still pounding and the body convulsing vigorously (a reflex action of the spinal cord) driving maximum blood out of the body.

    Stunning
    1. The animals were apparently unconscious soon after stunning but the EEG showed severe pain immediately after stunning.

    2. The heart of the stunned animal stopped beating earlier than the one slaughtered the Islamic way thus resulting in the retention of more blood in the meat.

    Professor Schultz and Dr. Hazim of the Hanover University in Germany concluded the following through an experiment:

    Islamic way of slaughtering is the most humane, compassionate and sympathetic method of slaughter (no pain, deep sleep recorded due to the large quantity of blood gushing out from the body), and that the captive bolt stunning practiced by the Western methods causes severe pain to the animal.

    Humankind and Animals
    Allah created animals for the service of humans and are a boon to him, and one must utilize them in the name of Allah. We should make judicious use of them for our benefit and must be grateful to God. Due care should be there. There is a hierarchical ranking and distinction between living beings. The animals are superior to plants, which can be sacrificed for them, while plants and animals can be sacrificed for man. However, only the prescribed and permitted animals can be sacrificed (al-Qur'an - Chapter 6, Verse 145; Chapter 5, Verses 3, 96; Chapter 6, Verse 121; Chapter 40, Verses 79-81) for humans in a prescribed manner. Humankind should remember that the earth belongs to all living creatures.

    And, He has set out the earth for all creatures.
    (al-Qur'an - Chapter 55, Verse 10)

    In Qur'an:

    And, Allah has made subservient to you whatsoever is in the heavens and whatsoever is in the earth - all of it - on His behalf. Verily, in this are signs for people who reflect.
    (al-Qur'an- Chapter 45, Verse 13)

    What, do they not see that We have created the cattle for them, of what Our hands have wrought, and of them, they are the masters?

    In addition, We subjected unto the cattle; and some of them they ride upon, and some of them they eat. And, for them, in them are benefits and drinks. What, will they not be grateful?
    (al-Qur'an- Chapter 36, Verses 71-73)

    In such cases, it is also possible that the animal offers itself for slaughter. The recommendation to hunters is to invoke the name of Allah even when they are about to fire a bullet, or send a dog, and so forth, to subdue the animal. Moreover, because certain specific animals have been sent into this world to care and provide food to the humans, the act of invoking the name of Allah would remind them of their responsibility in this world

    It is reported that Prophet Isa (AS) once called a Deer and it came towards him and agreed to be slaughtered. Prophet Isa (AS) consumed the meat of the animal and then, by the permission of Allah, he gave life to the animal and resurrected the Deer. The animal then disappeared in the bushes.

    Allah confirms that animals are conscious, have a purpose in life and will return to Allah:

    There is not an animal (that lives) on the earth, or a being that flies on its wings, but (forms part of) communities like you. Nothing have we omitted from the Book, and they (all) shall be gathered to their Lord in the end.
    (Qur'an - Chapter 6, Verse 38)

    Many passages from the Qur'an and traditions state that all animals are endowed with spirit and mind and there is ample evidence in the Qur'an to suggest that animals' consciousness of spirit and mind is of a degree higher than mere instinct and intuition.

    We are told in the Qur'an that animals have a cognizance of their Creator and, hence, they pay their obeisance to Him by adoration and worship:

    Don't you see that it is Allah Whose praises are celebrated by all beings in the heavens and on earth, and by the birds with extended wings? Each one knows its prayer and psalm, And Allah is aware of what they do.
    (al-Qur'an - Chapter 24, Verse 41)

    The following verse tells us how all the elements of nature and all the animal kingdom function in harmony with God's laws; it is only humans who infringe, and thus bring affliction on themselves. The Qur'an dwells on this theme repeatedly to emphasize the point that man should bring himself into harmony with nature, according to the laws of God - as all other creation does:

    Don't you see that all things that are in the heavens and on earth pay adoration to Allah - the sun, the moon, the stars, the mountains, the trees, the animals, and a large number among mankind? However, there are many (humans) who do not and deserve chastisement.
    (al-Qur'an - Chapter 22, Verse 18)

    A Dutch team of scientists recently found scientific evidence of mental suffering in animals. They have discovered that, like the human brain, an animal's brain too releases a substance called Endorphin to cope with emotional distress and pain, caused by frustration or conflict. This substance is 100 times more powerful than morphine. (Report by Compassion in World Farming Agscene, August 1985, 20 Lavant Street, Petersfield, Hants, England).

    History also narrates that when Namrud was preparing the fire for Prophet Ibrahim (AS), there was a little frog that used to fill its mouth with water, and pour it on the fire to try to extinguish the fire. Apparently, the frog was just fulfilling his part of the responsibility if the animal is asked about this on the Day of Judgment.

    Animals have been reported and observed to communicate with humans, and many such incidents have been recorded in the blessed life of the Prophet (S). In several instances, and as we shall note later, animals have complained of their hunger to the Prophet (S). They have even witnessed the Prophet's leadership on many occasions. Many instances in the history of Prophet Suleiman show his ability to communicate with animals. Shamanic practitioners have also been observed to communicate with animals and ask their spirits before they make a sacrifice. Apparently, Allah (SWT) has given this power to humans as well. It is therefore possible that animals offer themselves when one invokes the name of Allah, as the animal would associate the name as his or her creator and his or her responsibilities on earth. Allah knows better.

    Allamah Taba Tabai (AR) discusses the following about sacrificing animals and consuming their flesh, and is worth mentioning in his own words:

    It shows that as far as eating of meats are concerned, humanity is divided in numerous categories. The spectrum shows on one side total prohibition and on the other unrestricted indulgence. When he uses some meats, he follows the dictates of nature, and when he refrains from some items, it emanates from some ideology, or is a result of his second nature.

    The Buddhist system prohibited use of all animals altogether. This is one extreme, and its opposite is the excess which was prevalent among uncivilized people, in Africa and elsewhere, who had no hesitation in eating any meat, even the flesh of man.

    The Arabs used to eat the meat of quadrupeds and other animals, even rats and lizards. They ate all types of dead cattle, which they killed by slaughtering, or which died by itself, was strangled or beaten to death. They ate what died as a result of fall, or by being gored by another animal, or which was killed by beasts of prey. They ridiculed the Muslims, saying, Why is it that you eat what you kill yourselves and do not eat what has been killed by Allah. Many people offer similar objections even today. Some people say, What is the difference between one flesh and the other, when the human body does not get any harm from, especially if it is hygienically prepared, because the digestive system does not differentiate between this and that?

    The Arabs also used to eat blood. They filled the intestine with blood, roasted it and offered it to the guests. During famine days, they used to wound their camels with arrows and drank the blood, which came gushing out. Even today, eating of blood is common among many non- Muslims communities.

    The Chinese Buddhists are more liberal than the ancient Arabs are. Reportedly, they eat all types of animals including dogs and cats, even the worms, seashells and all types of insects.

    Islam has chartered a middle course, and has allowed the meats, which are agreeable to the normal human nature. It has selected in quadrupeds the cattle like sheep, goats, cows and camels (also horse and donkey, although with dislike); among the birds, it disallowed the birds of prey and allowed those other birds which have craw and those which flap their wings more often and do not have talon. In marine animals, it has allowed some categories of fish, details of which may be found in books of Islamic Laws.

    Even while allowing the above-mentioned animals, it has prohibited its blood and that which has died of itself and on which the name of Allah has not been invoked. The purpose behind these rules is to revitalize the natural canon, inasmuch as the man naturally likes to eat meat. Together with it, Islam respects the correct thinking and normal nature as these too are repulsed from eating those things, which may prove harmful to human being, or which the human nature thinks odious and unclean.

    He also remarks:

    The prohibition of strangling an animal or beating it to death comes under this category of rules. In addition, it has forbidden slaughtering an animal with another one looking at it. At the time of slaughtering, many rules based on mercy have been laid down, as for examples, the animal should be given water before slaughtering, and so on, details of which can be seen in books of jurisprudence.

    When all is said and written, the fact remains that Islam is a religion of reason, not of sentiments. It does not give precedence to the dictates of sentiments over the rules, which are meant to bring reform in the human society. It accepts only that sentiment which is accepted by the reason. So in the end, that too becomes the dictate of reason.

    As for the talk of divine Mercy and His being the most Merciful of all, do they think that Allah is tenderhearted being? On the other hand, that his senses are influenced and He feels pity on some things? Obviously, these are material and physical characteristics and Allah is far above such things. The Divine Mercy means that Allah bestows good on someone who deserves it as much as he deserves it. That is why sometimes what we think is punishment turns out to be the Mercy from Him, and vice versa. Consequently, according to the reason, it is not good to neglect or discard a beneficial action by listening to what is suggested by our false mercy. Nor is it allowed to be negligent in legislating the Islamic Laws, keeping in view the realities of the creation.

    Meat of Animals Slaughtered by Muslims is Electrically Balanced and Stable - A Note on Battery-Farmed Meats and Leather Belts

    Dr. Hazim remarks further that the Electro-Encephalographic (EEG) recordings of the animals (after being slaughtered) dropped to a zero level, and the heart was still pounding, the body convulsing vigorously (a reflex action), and driving maximum blood out from the body. This procedure greatly results in hygienic and electrically balanced (with steady energy fields) meat for the consumer.

    Schwartz and Russek (1999) make a stern comment in their book The Living Energy Universe on ingesting just any meat, in particular that meat from animals that are often raised (and slaughtered) under stressful and abusive circumstances and we ingest their cells (with unfavorable info-energy) into our bodies. Their molecules then replace some of our molecules, and we end up living with the info-energy of the animal's pain and suffering. One's health can thus be compromised.

    Concerning battery cages in the US and several countries in the West, it has been argued that there may be no experience of life more fraught with stress and pain than that of the battery-caged animal. These animals do not live on a farm, but inside a gigantic metal factory. Such facilities hold literally millions of animals that are confined in row after row of tiny wire battery cages. These cages are too small to allow them to stand in a normal upright position, much less stretch, unfold their limbs, or exercise. Throughout the course of her short life, the battery-caged animal will be forced to endure beak mutilations, overcrowding, filth, disease, and periodic starvation.

    On July 24th 2003 and on behalf of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), Sir Paul McCartney ran a full-page ad, featuring an open letter to one fast-food restaurant (not named) CEO, in today's Louisville Courier-Journal, the hometown paper of this fast-food restaurant's corporate offices. In the ad, McCartney challenged the CEO to improve living and dying conditions for the 750 million chickens that are raised every year in overcrowded, feces-filled sheds on factory farms and killed in frightening ways for these restaurants.

    Among the improvements that McCartney and PETA wanted the restaurants to implement were the following - replacing crude and ineffective electric stunning and throat-slitting with painless gas killing; phasing out the forced rapid growth of chickens, which causes their leg bones to become crippled; and implementing gentler, automated chicken-catching, which would reduce the high incidence of bruising and broken wings and legs, and much of the terror associated with manual catching by low-paid catchers, who often roughly sling the birds into wooden crates.

    In brief, the cages are frightening, smelling of death and disease. Animals sit on vast stretches of land, countless rows of giant metal structures protruding into the sky. From a distance, you can get an eerie sense of the overwhelming number of animals who live day after day, minute after minute, inside the long windowless sheds. From rows of cages stacked floor to ceiling, the animals have been observed to cry out. The air is dense with the screams of thousands of animals that are suffering extreme physical and psychological pain.

    Texas County pig farm worker in the US pleaded to three counts of felony cruelty to animals stemming from a PETA undercover investigation. The videotape showing the manager of this particular farm (not named) owned pig farm, mercilessly bludgeoning pigs with iron gate rods in three separate incidents. This is the first time in U.S. history that a farmer has pleaded to felony cruelty to animals for injuring and killing animals raised for food. On May 14th 2001, PETA submitted the video to Texas County District Attorney Donald E. Wood, whose office filed charges against the manager on August 31.

    Employees at this farm, North America's third largest pork producer, were also caught on video routinely throwing, beating, kicking, slamming against concrete floors, and bludgeoning animals with metal gate rods and hammers. Other pigs were left to die slow and agonizing deaths with severe injuries, illness, and lameness, often unable to reach food or water, without even a trace of veterinary care despite the fact that Peņa was fully aware of their conditions.

    In 1999, in North Carolina, the first-ever felony indictments for cruelty to animals on a factory farm in the U.S. were issued against 3 workers after an investigation into a pig breeding facility. In that case, all three workers were convicted for their parts in the beating and bludgeoning of pigs, including the skinning of a sow, which was still fully conscious.

    On September 5th 2001, PETA announced that it will continue its campaign moratorium against one of the largest chain fast food restaurants in the world, but will pressure the corporation to adopt less abusive slaughter standards for chickens and to internationalize its animal welfare standards. In 1997, this worldwide chain of restaurant was found culpably responsible for cruelty to animals in a court of law.

    Chickens raised for this fast-food restaurant (not named) are crammed into crowded, filthy warehouses with less space per bird than a standard sheet of paper. This overcrowding causes disease, suffocation, and heart attacks. Some breeding pigs raised for this restaurant live their entire lives in cement stalls, unable to turn around, lie in a comfortable position, or nuzzle their babies. U.S. federal standards for slaughter say that all animals should be fully stunned before their throats are slit, but this restaurant considers it acceptable if slaughterhouses inadequately stun 1 in 20 animals, and refuses to ask their suppliers to hire extra stunners.

    Most people who eat meat don't think too deeply about all the processes involved in converting a living animal to meat on their plate. For modern animal agriculture, the less the consumer knows about what's happening before the meat hits the plate, the better. If true, is this an ethical situation? Should the animal agriculture be reluctant to let people know what really goes on, because we're not really proud of it .? (Cheeke, 1999)

    In a press release dated May 20th 2003, US Congressman Jim Moran (VA) says:

    The vast majority of meat, milk, and eggs in America come from factory farms, which hardly resembles bucolic family farms many Americans envision their food comes from. Instead, they are part of agribusiness, where animals are mass-produced for the slaughterhouse. And, in the agribusiness, financial profitability takes priority over treating animals humanely.

    Unfortunately, the Food Marketing Institute's (FMI) Animal Welfare Program guidelines do not require that a sow (mother pig) have enough room to walk or turn around, but rather that she actually has enough room to fit in the cage without being forced against the bars (FMI-NCRR Animal Welfare Program - January 2003 Report).

    Up to six egg-laying hens have been observed to live in a battery cage with a wire floor area of 1.7 square feet. These conditions lead to lameness, bone brittleness, osteoporosis, and muscle weakness (Rollin, 1995). During transport, all farmed animals lose at least 3% of their weight, most in the first hour, from urination and defecation as a result of stress. These animals must stand in their excrement and they are exposed to extreme weather conditions in the open trucks, sometimes freezing to the trailer (USDA, 1997).

    Competition to produce inexpensive meat, eggs, and dairy products has led animal agribusiness to treat animals as objects and commodities. The worldwide trend is to replace family farms with factory farms; warehouses where animals are kept in crowded pens or restrictive stalls. Large numbers of beef cattle, dairy cows, pigs, chickens, and turkeys are raised under such conditions.

    Because of the respect, honor and reverence Muslims give to animals and individual animal slaughter (more on this under the section - Islam's Stand on Vegetarianism), scientists have shown beyond doubt that Muslim-slaughtered (Halal) meat is the most electrically balanced meat, and therefore most hygienic and healthy. Heistand and Coleman (1999) write in their book Electrical Nutrition that animals display extreme fear in the slaughterhouse environment employed by western societies. Commercially produced chickens are traumatized and react with extreme fear when slaughtered, because of their unbelievably cramped and over-crowded cages. All this creates a highly unstable network of energy within the animal and thus affecting its meat. In their words:

    The most disharmonic food by far, from an electrical understanding, would be battery farmed chicken.

    Imam Ali (AS) has said, and reported in al-Kafi - Volume 6, Page 229:

    Do not slaughter a sheep in the presence of another sheep and a camel in the presence of another camel while they are looking at the animals being slaughtered.

    Interestingly, non-Muslim researchers, Heistand and Coleman (1999) continue:

    All slaughtering undertaken with honor and as a part of a ceremonial sacrifice, as in HALAL killing as practiced in the Middle East, and other ceremonies practiced by many cultures around the world, balances any of the emotional traumatic frequencies that one would be concerned about.

    It is, therefore, apparent that the non-Halal meat in supermarkets, non-Muslim butchery centers, and meat in fast-food restaurants contains disharmonic, highly unstable and weak fields of energy, together with painful and traumatic info-energy, thereby affecting the meat and making it unhealthy for consumers. To consume such meat would not only mean disobeying Allah (SWT), the electrically unstable meat would introduce a host of electrical, energy and info-energy malfunctions into one's system as he or she consumes the meat, making that individual vulnerable, and prone to health and mental challenges.

    Besides the disturbance to the electrical network of the meat, the fear and panic caused to the animal slaughtered in battery-farms would further cause the animal to produce stress-related chemicals into their system that would alter the meat's chemical composition as well. Heistand and Coleman (1999) report that such kinds of unstable meat, when consumed on a long-term basis may lead to cancer, and other degenerative diseases. The psycho-physiological effects of long-term stress in humans have been documented in ample studies. The hormones and chemicals released during stress do a lot of damage to the tissues rendering them unfit for human consumption (Kamoonpuri, 1998).

    The effects of unfavorable and unsteady energy contrived within the animal during slaughter are therefore significant and the studies worth mentioning. Weston (1998) writes that Dr. Puharich and seven other U.S. Navy physicians discovered that when they radiated mice with a lower frequency, unstable 5 Hz frequencies, cancer was induced within 48 hours. When the mice were radiated with the higher frequency, free flowing, balanced healer energy frequency of 8 Hz the mice's tumors were healed within 48 hours.

    Ostrander and Schroeder (1970) quote Dr. Errera, Councilor of nuclear matters to the Belgian government, that traditional healers have been recorded in reliable experiments to be able to induce free flowing and harmonious energy from their hands to animal flesh. This act has been observed to purify the meat with higher and more balanced/coherent vibrations of energy, so much that it does not deteriorate for a month, even though the meat was never refrigerated.

    Moreover, Kamoonpuri (1998) lists down the following that also has to take place during any kind of Islamic slaughter:

  • The knife must not be sharpened in front of the animal.

  • The animals should not be slaughtered in front of each other.

  • The animals should be given water to drink before slaughtering.

  • The animal should be laid on its sides, soothed and should be stroked gently on its back.

  • Having the animal slaughtered on its right side with its left side exposed, the benefits are worth mentioning. According to Kamoonpuri (1998), this advice by the Prophet is perfect and a scientific fact. When the left side of the neck is incised, the carotid arteries are cut first thereby stopping oxygenated blood from reaching the brain. The animal thus becomes unconscious because of oxygen depletion. This procedure results in the same two actions mentioned earlier - convulsions based on the muscular contractions that drives out all the remaining blood, and no pain is experienced.

    Islam has strictly prohibited tampering with the lives of animals and inflicting torture upon them just for the sake of fun. Setting animals against each other, such as cocks, oxen, or sheep, for the sake of fun or for any other reason, is completely forbidden in Islam. Using an animal as a target for shooting practice with a gun or bow is forbidden. The Prophet cursed one who kills a living creature as a mere sport. The Prophet prohibited the setting of animals so as to fight one another. The birds, which are flying beauties, are not to be harmed for the sake of fun, since the Prophet said:

    A sparrow that was killed just for fun would, on the Day of Judgment, complain (to God) against the person who did so, just for fun and not for any material gain.

    The Prophet admonished us to avoid the seven abominations (sins), and for one of the sins he recited the following verse of the Qur'an, (Kill not a living creature, which God has made sacrosanct, except for a justifiable reason). That person will be answerable to God if he kills a sparrow or anything smaller without a justifiable reason. When asked what would be a justifiable reason, he (the Prophet) replied, to slaughter it for food-not to kill and discard it. The Prophet prohibited stoning animals even with pebbles - Even if it does not kill or bleed, it may harm their eyes and teeth.

    Since animals are communities, just as humankind is, they, too, deserve mercy and affection. The Prophet said, Our Most Merciful God showers His mercy on those who are themselves merciful. One who has been endowed with a gentle nature has received a portion of the goodness of this world and the next. If you want to be loved by your Creator, love His creatures. God says, If you are anxious to receive kindness from Me, offer kindness to My creatures.

    When the Prophet (S) was asked to define Islam, he said to believe in Allah and be kind to the whole of creation.

    Leather Belts
    People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) reports that every year, the $14.5 million global leather industry tans millions of animal skins, many animals from whom these skins are taken suffer all the horrors of factory farming, including extreme crowding and confinement, deprivation, anaesthetized castration, branding, tail docking, dehorning, and cruel treatment during transport and slaughter.

    Humaneness is not a priority of those who poach and hunt animals to obtain their skin or those who transform skin into leather. Alligators on farms may be beaten to death with hammers and axes, sometimes-remaining conscious and in agony for up to two hours after being skinned (Reid, 1997).

    Crocodiles are often caught with huge hooks and wires and reeled in, when they weaken from blood loss. Poachers sometimes kill one species of animal to use as bait to capture another. Snakes and lizards may be skinned alive because of the belief that live flaying imparts suppleness to the finished leather.

    Kid goats may be boiled alive to make kid gloves and the skins of unborn calves and lambs, some purposely aborted, others from slaughtered pregnant cows and ewes, are considered especially luxurious. Shearling, contrary to what many consumers think, is not sheared wool. The term refers to the sheep. A Shearling is a yearling sheep, which has been shorn once. A Shearling garment is made from a sheep or lamb shorn shortly before slaughter. The skin is tanned with the wool still on it.

    For the above reasons and reasons mentioned below, Muslims are prohibited from wearing leather belts during prayer - leather from an animal, which was slaughtered in a non-Muslim manner. The weaker fields of energy and tainted info-energy remain in the memory and energy surrounding the belt. These memories of torture and pain most certainly have the ability to interfere with the energy fields related to one's attention in prayer. This concept is explored in details in the section on Prayer.

    Kindness to Animals The Islamic worldview and guidelines give sufficient basis for a humane treatment of animals. One major objective of Islam is that it seeks to make the human being kind hearted towards fellow creatures. Kindness is an important ingredient of the human conscience. God Himself is compassionate and kind and wants man, His vicegerent on earth, to be kindhearted towards all living creatures.

    The animal world in Qur'an has its own rights, just like that of the human world. Animals have similar characteristics, peculiarities, temperaments, and consciousness of their own. They have the ability to experience what we all consider to be morally relevant states of consciousness such as pain, distress, fear, anxiety, loneliness, boredom, joy, and pleasure. Many animal species other than mammals share abilities we thought made humankind singular, such as communications, tool using and tool making, love and nurturing a partner and family. Altruism has been observed in most species. This modern ethological finding is reflected in the Qur'anic concept of animals as a community just as humanity is, (there is no creature on earth, or a bird, which flies on wings, but they are communities like you, al-Qur'an - Chapter 6, Verse 38). This verse elegantly speaks also of the sanctity of life.

    The ancient nation of Thamud was warned that even a thirsty camel has its own drinking right. The story of Prophet Salih (AS) and the people of Thamud illustrate the moral that denying animals their basic right to pasture and spring for food and water is a heinous sin in divine vision. The Thamud had arrogated all rights of water and pasture to themselves. On Prophet Salih's intervention, the due of the poor and their cattle was given to each in turn. As a test case, a she-camel was selected, which, according to the agreement, would enjoy free access to the spring and the pasture. However, the privileged people killed the she-camel, which caused their destruction by an earthquake.

    One of the messages in the story is that all animals have their rights in the resources of nature and that man can only deny them at his own peril. In the anecdotes of Prophet Nuh (AS) and his ark, the Prophet was directed to load (in the ark) from everything a pair, male and female. This is indicative of the divine scheme of life on earth, which for balance requires preservation of all types of animals. Qur'an lays down the duty of being good towards, and doing good to, the animals. God loves those who are kind and enjoin kindness.

    People should not kill a living creature, which God has made sacrosanct, except for a justifiable reason. Even the faithful are specifically enjoined not to kill game while in the sacred precincts in pilgrim's garb. Reflecting the prominence of animals in the divine scheme of things, many chapters in al-Qur'an are named after animals in the Qur'an - the Cow, the Cattle, the Bee, the Ant, the Spider, and the Elephant. Thus, we see that Islam sanctifies life in all its aspects, omitting nothing from its embrace.

    As Imam Ali (AS) says that, he would not steal a morsel of food from the mouth of ant even if the entire heavens and the earth were handed to him. His son Imam al-Husain (AS) displayed a similar behavior in the event of Karbala (just before his martyrdom) by giving water to his horse first.

    Allamah Taba Tabai (AR) writes that Husain bin Saeed has also narrated the following tradition from the same Imam. In the same book Ja'far bin Muhammad narrates from his father, the Holy Messenger had ordered us to desist from physically branding animals or hitting them on their faces because these animals too chant their praises of the Lord. We shall mention the praises of each animal later.

    The same book records Ishaq bin Ammar bin Abi Abdullah quoting from Imam Sadiq:

    Every animal on land and in sea falls prey because it has been negligent in praising the Lord.

    Kulayni has quoted this tradition from Muhammad bin Muslim and he in turn from Imam Sadiq that the Messenger said:

    No one should scar or brand the faces of the animals.

    Allamah Taba Tabai (AR) writes:

    This question gives precedence to the feelings over realities. Legislation follows the real good of humanity and not the emotional feelings. We may expound it as follows, Look minutely all the things, which you find around yourselves, you will see that all of them in their creation and follow the law of continuous change. All things without exception do change to other things; and those other things in their turn do change into these things - directly or indirectly. Nothing comes into being unless another thing loses existence in the process. Nothing continues living on this earth without something else going out of existence. This material world is the world of change and exchange; or you may say, the world of the eater and the eaten. The earthly compounds eat the earth itself by absorbing its chemicals to themselves changing them to their own images; then after sometime, the earth again eats and destroys them. Again, the vegetable world gets its nourishment from the earth and absorbs the air, then later the earth eats it and breaks it down to its original ingredients, the first elements; and this cycle continues.

    How comes the animal world which gets its nourishment from vegetables, water and air. Some animals feed themselves on other animals, like the wild beasts, which eat the meat of their preys; and likewise predatory birds eat the pigeons and sparrows. The digestive systems of these carnivorous animals and birds do not accept any other food. The small birds in their turn feed on grain, flies, fleas, insects and mosquitoes, while the mosquitoes feed on blood of man and other animals. Then, finally, the earth devours them all.

    Clearly, the system of creation, which has overall control on all the creatures, has ordained that man should get nourishment from meats, etc., then it has guided the previous parts of existence towards it.

    It is the system, which has created in human beings the ability to get sustenance from both animals and vegetables. He has in the front of his alimentary system the teeth, some of which are made to cut, the others to break, some to tear and others to grind. They are called canines, molars, premolars and incisors. Man is not like goat or cow, which cannot cut or tear apart, nor is he like the beasts of prey, which cannot grind or incise.

    Islam is a natural religion. Its only aim is to revive the tracks of nature, which the human ignorance has obliterated. It is bound to declare lawful what the creation guides to and the nature decrees. Islamic Legislation revives this natural commandment; and in the same way, it restores other arrangements, which the Creator has ingrained in our nature. We have already mentioned that it confirms the decree of reason that one should abstain from such meats, which are harmful physically or spiritually, and it strengthens the inner feelings by prohibiting what the normal human nature dislikes or feels aversion. These two principles ultimately are based on the Divine management of the creation, and Islam has given credence to them. It has prohibited that, which harms the growth of the body and has forbidden that, which is injurious to the well being of human society. For example, that which has been slaughtered in the name of other than Allah or that which has been obtained through gambling and dividing with arrows and so on; and it has prohibited those repulsive things which the nature abhors.

    Meat of Pig is Forbidden in Islam

    Muhammad ibn Abdillah narrates from one of his companions that he said - I said to Abu Abdillah (AS), May I be made your ransom! Why did Allah forbid the dead animal, blood and flesh of swine?

    He said:

    As for the flesh of swine, verily Allah had transformed some groups in various forms, resembling swine, monkey, bear and other such animals. Then He prohibited (His servants) to eat the animals of similar shapes in order that they should not be polluted by it and should not take the Divine punishment lightly.
     
    In Islam, Pig's meat is forbidden, and the reason why this rule was prescribed upon Muslims is that Pigs are mainly scavengers. However you struggle to maintain their food intake, they will return to what they are normally used to and is a normal way of living and eating to their standards. Pig is an animal, which lives on offal and pigsty. Abstention from eating pork is a measure to safeguard health. Of all the domestic animals, Pig is the most avaricious, eating anything including human excreta. It is the cradle of harmful germs and parasites. Its meat is a carrier of diseases to man, thus making it unfit for human consumption. Such prohibition is also found in the Bible:
    The Pig also, because it is a splitter of the hoof but there is no cud. It is unclean for you. None of their flesh must you eat and carcass you must not touch. Deuteronomy 14:8 (Bible)

    The Westminster Dictionary of the Bible clearly states that:
    The swine is ceremonially unclean animal ... It is dirty, does not refuse to eat offal or carrion, and the use of its flesh for food in hot countries is supposed to produce skin diseases. It was not raised by Arabs, and was regarded as unclean by Phoenicians, Ethiopians, and Egyptians ... To the Jews, swine's flesh is abominable, and the Pig was the emblem of filth and coarseness...
    Athar (1986) asked farmers in Fisher, Indiana who breed Swine, and their comments:
    Swine is cheaper to breed, since it does not require pasture, it can live on manure and other such items including dead meat. In fact, it can even eat its own feces. Their sexual habits are also different from other animals like cow, sheep and goat. Swine have very little shame i.e. engage in sex acts anytime, anywhere.

    The female hog is very aggressive in sexual activities, and when she is in heat she does not care about anything (i.e. food or privacy) until she has the sex. They i.e. swine, also lick the genitals of their partners after sex like dogs, but not other mammals like cow, sheep or goat.
    It is apparent that an animal who lives such a life and spends most of his time scavenging food particles, which have astonishing unstable and low charge networks of energy, making the energy fields surrounding the body and soul of that animal highly unstable and the meat, therefore unhealthy. The unfavorable and corrupt info-energy within Pigs can hardly be questioned.

    It is apparent that an animal who lives such a life and spends most of his time scavenging food particles, which have astonishing unstable and low charge networks of energy, making the energy fields surrounding the body and soul of that animal highly unstable and the meat, therefore unhealthy. The unfavorable and corrupt info-energy within Pigs can hardly be questioned.
    Whosoever eats the meat of Pig shall have no shame.
    And, because Pigs love watching their partners have sexual relations with other male Pigs, this makes its meat even more dangerous. This is why we see this practice in Western continents. Athar (1986) writes that consuming dead meat, for example, can and does also lead to that individual following after the instincts of that animal. This aspect is explained further in details in the section on Transplants.

    In folkloric terms, eating the meat of the Pig is said to contribute to lack of morality and shame, plus greed for wealth, laziness, indulgence, dirtiness and gluttony. We insult a person by calling him or her a Pig when they demonstrate these characteristics. This is much apparent in societies where Pig's meat is consumed in large quantities.

    Many Far Eastern traditions also discourage the eating of pork. The 3,000-yearold Confucian Book of Rites says that a person does not eat the flesh of Pigs and Dogs. Although many Chinese are avid eaters of pork today, physicians of ancient China recognized eating pork as the root of many human ailments. Kamoonpuri (1998) quotes Nanji and a French scientist who found a significant correlation between eating pork and the incidence of a liver disease, Cirrhosis. An even higher incidence was revealed when alcohol consumption was added. Shepard (1952) found a similar correlation.

    The argument that certain farms will raise Pigs in a very clean and unpolluted manner is weak, since one can hardly proclaim to watch the animal all the time when it is feeding or having sex. Further, according to the systemic memory process, the fields of energy within Pigs (with stored previous memories and experiences) may contain significant adulterated memories and will have already affected the meat in some way. This may also apply to other animals, but more to Pigs.

    Such foods can and do affect people and make them vulnerable. It is reported that in the event of the battle in Karbala, al-Husain (AS) informed the troops of Ibn Sa'ad who were his enemies and denied the Truth of Islam from the grandson of the Prophet (S) that a lot of their behaviors and decisions against Islam were a result of eating non-Halal foods.

    al-Husain (AS) addressed the troops of Yazid as follows:
    Your bellies are filled with the unlawful. Now you will not accept the truth. Why don't you deal with justice? Why don't you listen to me?
    Clearly, the Infallible complained in general about the people's un-Islamic eating behaviors and the effect on one's mind, body and soul. Apparently, to abstain from consuming such products is also one of the many rules to attain spiritual perfection (Taba Tabai, 1991).

    A similar incident was observed when Muhammad Hanafiyya was in the battle of Siffin fighting for Islam and refused to proceed further because of too many forthcoming arrows. Ali (AS) patted him on his shoulder and told him that such a nervous behavior was a result of his mother's milk when he was a baby and being breastfed, (The mother of Hanafiyya was not Fatima al-Zahra (AS).

    Certain other animals are also considered as Forbidden Foods in Islam. These include beasts of prey with canine teeth - Muslims cannot eat the primates (monkeys, man, etc) and the canidae (dog, wolf, fox, etc), as well as the felidae (cat, lion, tiger, etc).

    Ayatullah Sayyid Dastghaib al-Shirazi has the following to say on the effects of forbidden foods and food prepared by a non-Muslim:
    As long as even one morsel of haram (unlawful) food is in the body of a person, he is himself like the Satan. Beating drums and seeking protection from Satan is his hypocrisy. As long as he is not able to shake away the influence of Satan from his person, all his prayers are mere pretences.

    About Rizq-e-Halal (legitimate food), there are several traditions of Ahlul-Bayt (AS). Rizq-e- Halal is like a seed on which the quality of the plant will depend. Care must be exercised and good seed to ensure the health and sturdiness of the tree.

    Allah says in the Holy Qur'an:
    O people, eat pure and halal food and don't tread the footprints of Satan.

    When one has doubt about the food being halal, he should rather abstain from eating it. Avoid using haram food and clothes. The use of these will have such deleterious effect on the person that he becomes the victim of fears and doubts.

    The foods we consume take us to darkness. There is no light in them that can give nourishment to our spirits. Our tongues too are influenced by these foods that we utter falsehoods and abusive language. We indulge in misguiding games and play. Backbiting has become our habit. All our limbs and organs have been exposed to the effects of haram and unsavory (makruh) foods. The body has therefore become insensitive to the instinct of remembrance of Allah. The limbs and organs have thus turned into the playthings of Satan.

    One type of haram food is najis (impure) food. If impure food goes down the throat, Satan will transmit his effect throughout the body.

    Even babes in arms should not be fed with najis food. One should not think that a child is innocent and free from the incidence of the rules of Islamic Law.

    Remember, the adults are bound with the requirements of the Islamic Law and it is their duty to take care to nourish their children with pure food. When a child is brought up on najis food, he will develop negative and un-Islamic tendencies as he grows up. It is to be borne in minds that only animals can take Najis food.

    The occasion when one is required to abstain even from Halal food is when he is fully satiated and can eat no more at that moment. Over-eating is a taboo and a satanic trait.

    Sayyid Tawus has recommended application of this verse to all foods, although the verse pertains only to animal foods. Sayyid Tawus says, All the edibles that are prepared without taking the name of Allah before commencing the preparation, I don't partake! How can a believer eat the bread that has been cooked by the baker without taking the name of Allah?

    Qur'an:
    Verily those who guard (themselves against evil) when an evil thought from the Satan afflicts them, they become mindful (of God and are awakened) then lo! They see (aright).